Protesting in Iran over Election Result
So, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad seems to have won the presidential elections in Iran, causing mass riots since the people believe they have elected someone else. I don't think anyone is really surprised at this. And those who are would do well to read up on how Iran is ruled. The facts are that the President wields almost no power, and is almost nothing but a figurehead. He is officially the second most powerful man in Iran. But he is second to one of the most powerful local authorities, the Ayatollah. The Ayatollah is formally called the Supreme Leader, and is the de facto leader of the Islamic Republic of Iran. And he has been since the enactment of the new constitution of 1979. To quote wikipedia: "The Supreme Leader is Commander-in-Chief of the armed forces, controls the military intelligence and security operations; and has sole power to declare war or peace." source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iran#Government_and_politics
Now, hold on a minute, The supreme leader has all of these powers (seems a lot, but is no less than some of our western leaders mind you), but who elects him? Well, there's an "assembly of experts" that elects and dismisses him based on some small qualifications and his popularity. Excuse me, his popularity? What kind of a way is that to elect anyone? And who are these people in the "so-called" assembly of experts? They are 86 Mujtahids (or Islamic Scholars if you will) that are elected from a government-screened list of candidates and by direct public vote. Ok, so the people can actually vote on who goes into this assembly, but they cannot vote for whoever they want. I know this isn't that dissimilar to some of our western countries, where we have two "presidential candidates" or two "parties" and so forth. But at least in europe, anyone can start a party, at least for now. And who are these people doing the screening of the list of candidates. All info (source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Assembly_of_Experts) I could find was that it is the "government" without further explanation.
Either way, the presidential Elections in Iran are quite obviously a sham, and whoever have really won would obviously have made the world a better place. At least according to the rioting people.
My big question is, what good will rioting do? Hopefully, they will get a recount (seems to be underway, but who really knows?). But what if that recount shows that Ahmadinejad and not Mousavi have won. Will they continue rioting? And what if Mousavi have won, will Ahmadinejads followers accept defeat, I don't think so.
This situation has arisen because someone wants to destabilize Iran. We can only speculate at who. But at the worst possible time for a power that might rival the mighty US, it has been thrown into turmoil.
And what if the recount shows that the voting has been a fraud, will they do a re-election, or will they have to re-legislate to avoid it in the future?
Either way, it seems that Iran will undergo some very harsh and profound internal changes over the next couple of years.
On a side note, I would like to bring forward that Dr. Ron Paul's bill to audit the Federal Reserve, called the Federal Reserve Transparency Act (source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HR_1207) has gained enough co-sponsors to pass, 226 to be exact. This means that the Controller General (controlled by the congress) will get to audit what the Federal Reserve does with all the money. And it also ensures that Congress will get complete access to these Audit results. All in all a small victory for the people, and a bigger insight into what one of the worlds biggest moneylaundering schemes are really up to.
I know the main sources in this post is from wikipedia, but a recent comparison between Wikipedia and the Encyclopedia Britannica shows that they contain an equal amount of errors, so I am pretty safe in my assumption that Wikipedia does the job.
|
|













